The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PETER MARDILOVICH, DAVID CHAMPION, GREGORY S. HERMAN, and JAMES O’NEIL ____________ Appeal 2007-3580 Application 10/359,976 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 24, 2007 ____________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 the final rejection of claims 1-6, 8-11, 55, and 57-59. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013