The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte GERALD HOHENBICHLER
and GERALD ECKERSTORFER
________________
Appeal 2007-3581
Application 11/203,777
Technology Center 1700
________________
Decided: September 26, 2007
________________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 22-43, which are the only
claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
According to Appellants, the invention is directed to an apparatus for
continuous production of a rolled metal strip comprising a strip-casting
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013