Appeal 2007-3668 Application 11/031,587 polymer having a percentage of polymer fines of less than 0.5%. (Answer 4- 5). Appellant contends that support for the presently claimed invention can be found throughout the specification including original claims 20 and 22 (Br. 2 and Reply Br. 1-2). The Specification discloses: [A]nother embodiment of the invention is a polymerization process comprising providing a Ziegler-Natta type catalyst and contacting the Ziegler-Natta type catalyst with triisobutylaluminum to form a precontacted catalyst. The precontacted catalyst is then contacted with olefin monomer to form a prepolymerized catalyst. The prepolymerized catalyst is contacted with olefin monomer under polymerization reaction conditions to produce polymer fluff particles. The precontacted catalyst is at least 20% larger in average particle size than the Ziegler-Natta type catalyst and the prepolymerized catalyst has at least 50% fewer particles with a size of 40 microns or less than the precontacted catalyst less than 5% of the polymer fluff particles are 700 microns or less in size and the number of polymer fines produced is less than 0.5%. (Specification 0009). An ipsis verbis disclosure is not necessary to satisfy the written description requirement of Section 112. Instead, the disclosure need only reasonably convey to persons skilled in the art that the inventor had possession of the subject matter in question. See In re Edwards, 568 F.2d 1349, 1351-52, 196 USPQ 465, 467 (CCPA 1978). We agree with the Appellant, the Specification as originally filed clearly discloses the prepolymerized catalyst is contacted with olefin monomer under polymerization reaction conditions to produce a polymer having a 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013