The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte HORST MUEHLFELD, THOMAS SCHAUBER, and ERICH CHRISTOPH ________________ Appeal 2007-3673 Application 10/365,189 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: September 10, 2007 ________________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHARLES F. WARREN, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 1-9. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6. Claim 1 is illustrative: 1. A thermoplastically processable polyurethane molding material comprising:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013