Ex Parte Jarvis et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                 
                                         precedent of the Board.                                           

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                              ____________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                 
                                        Ex parte STEVE JARVIS,                                             
                                         KEN WHITCOMB, and                                                 
                                              ERIC SEVERY                                                  
                                              ____________                                                 
                                            Appeal 2007-3797                                               
                                         Application 10/453,061                                            
                                         Technology Center 1700                                            
                                              ____________                                                 
                                      Decided:  September 18, 2007                                         
                                              ____________                                                 

               Before CHUNG K. PAK, PETER F. KRATZ, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE,                                 
               Administrative Patent Judges.                                                               
               KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of               
               claims 1-33, the only claims that remain pending in this application.  We                   
               have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.                                       







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013