The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL CRAIG GOFF, SCOTT O’CONNOR,
LARRY MONAHAN, SCOTT WHITE, ANDY MUSER,
JOHN P. HALL, and FRANK E. MARTIN
____________
Appeal 2007-3828
Application 10/107,826
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 25, 2007
____________
Before PETER F. KRATZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-20, the only
claims pending in the application. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM.
Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A method of forming a multiwell plate, said method comprising:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013