Ex Parte Walke et al - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                     
                                     is not binding precedent of the Board.                                
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               __________                                                  
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                               __________                                                  
                  Ex parte WADE D. WALKE, NATHANIEL L. WILGANOWSKI, and                                    
                                     C. ALEXANDER TURNER, JR.                                              
                                               __________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-3881                                               
                                         Application 09/833,782                                            
                                         Technology Center 1600                                            
                                               __________                                                  
                                      Decided: September 24, 2007                                          
                                               __________                                                  
               Before TONI R. SCHEINER, ERIC B. GRIMES, and  NANCY J. LINCK,                               
               Administrative Patent Judges.                                                               
               GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to                          
               polynucleotides.  The Examiner has rejected the claims as lacking patentable                
               utility.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We reverse.                         
                                            BACKGROUND                                                     
                      The Specification discloses “human polynucleotides encoding a                        
               protein sharing sequence similarity with mammalian neurolysin proteins”                     
               (Spec. 1: 9-11).  “Neurolysins are soluble proteins of the zinc                             



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013