Ex Parte REXNORD INDUSTRIES, LLC et al - Page 1



                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                              ____________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                 
                                Ex parte REXNORD INDUSTRIES, LLC                                           
                                              ____________                                                 
                                            Appeal 2007-3920                                               
                                         Application 90/007,025                                            
                                         Technology Center 1600                                            
                                              ____________                                                 
                                      Decided: September 14, 2007                                          
                                              ____________                                                 
               Before JAMESON LEE, ADRIENE L. HANLON, and RICHARD                                          
               TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      The subject matter of the claim on appeal relates to a conveyor chain                
               for use in a product-capturing conveyor.  The examiner has rejected claim 3                 
               under the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting.  The appellant                     
               (Rexnord) seeks review.  We affirm.                                                         

                                                CLAIM 3                                                    
                      During reexamination, we are obligated to give a claim its broadest                  
               reasonable construction.  Claim 3, the sole claim on appeal, is reproduced                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013