The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TRIET MINH TIEU
____________
Appeal 2007-3939
Application 10/448,725
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: September 27, 2007
____________
Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP,
and MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134(a) and 6(b) from
the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-6 and 8-19. Claims 7 and 20 have been
objected to by the Examiner for being dependant upon rejected claims but
otherwise allowable if rewritten in independent form to include all of the
limitations of the base claim and any intervening claim.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013