The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DESIREE D. G. GOSBY and KEITH I. ITO
____________
Appeal 2007-3941
Application 10/334,370
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: September 28, 2007
____________
Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, MAHSHID D. SAADAT,
and SCOTT R. BOALICK, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the
Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1-8, 20, and 22-28, which are all of the
claims pending in this application, as claims 9-19 and 21 have been
canceled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm-in-part and enter a new ground of rejection pursuant to the
provisions of 37 CFR § 41.50(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013