The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DEENADAYALU CHUNDURY,
ROY C. SANFORD,
MATTHEW R. POWELL
And LARRY N. TROTTER
____________
Appeal 2007-3990
Application 10/194,943
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 26, 2007
____________
Before PETER F. KRATZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 9 and 15. We
have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013