Ex Parte OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al - Page 2

               Appeal 2007-4007                                                                             
               Application 90/006,954                                                                       
                            A method for increasing the capacity of insulin                                 
                      producing cells in an animal comprising repeatedly                                    
                      administering to said animal a therapeutically effective dose of                      
                      at least one DP IV enzyme activity effector and causing cells                         
                      present in the pancreas to differentiate into insulin producing                       
                      cells.                                                                                
                      We are obliged to construe a claim as broadly as is reasonably                        
               possible in view of the disclosure.  We understand the express step of the                   
               method to require the repeated dosing of a patient with an effective amount                  
               of at least one DP IV enzyme activity effector.  We further understand the                   
               result of this regimen to be, inter alia, the differentiation of some pancreas               
               cells into insulin-producing cells such that the collective cellular insulin-                
               producing capacity of the patient increases.  The claim is not limited to any                
               specific dosage or rate of administration.                                                   

                                            THE REJECTIONS                                                  
                      After the final rejection, OSI limited the claims under consideration to              
               claim 3.  Consequently, we take the final statement of the rejections from the               
               Examiner's Answer (Ans. 7-14).  Claim 3 stands rejected for being directed                   
               to an invention that was anticipated by a published German application                       
               (Probiodrug):                                                                                
                      Probiodrug Gesellschaft für Arzneimittelforschung, Neue                               
                      Effektoren von Dipeptidylpeptidase IV, DE 299 09 210 U1                               
                      (pub'd 9 September 1999)                                                              
               We rely on the English-language translation in the record.                                   
                      Claim 3 stands rejected for being directed to an invention that was                   
               anticipated by a Villhauer published application.                                            


                                                     2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013