Appeal 2007-4013
Application 09/768,512
nonobviousness and conclude that the claimed invention encompassed by
appealed claims 1, 2, 6 through 8, and 10 would have been obvious as a
matter of law under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
The Primary Examiner’s decision is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
cam
SUGHRUE – 265550
2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213
Best, 562 F.2d at 1255, 195 USPQ at 433-34.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: September 9, 2013