The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANDREAS SCHLEGEL,
PETER BAILLY,
JURGEN KISCHKEWITZ AND
KLAUS ROHBOCK
____________
Appeal 2007-4098
Application 09/962,887
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 26, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, PETER F. KRATZ, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 6. Claims 7 through 16, the
other claims pending in the above-identified application, stand withdrawn
from consideration by the Examiner as being directed to a non-elected
invention. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013