The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANDREAS SCHLEGEL
____________
Appeal 2007-4099
Application 09/962,935
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 26, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and
PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 8 and 19 through 21. Claims
9 through 18, the other claims pending in the above-identified application,
stand withdrawn from consideration by the Examiner as being directed to a
non-elected invention. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013