Appeal 2007-4133 Application 11/153,583 each other's presence to yield the sulfamate stabilized hypobromite as disclosed in the McCarthy '749 patent. The fact that the Applicant is claiming the reactants, as opposed to the final product, as a component within said microbicidal composition is irrelevant, as the resultant microbicidal composition as instantly claimed is identical to that disclosed in the McCarthy '749 patent. (Answer 4). The Examiner also asserts that “[t]he definition of a "stabilized hypochlorite and bromide composition", as clearly stated by the Applicant, comprises an alkali or alkaline earth metal hypochlorite, a bromide ion source and a stabilizer. The McCarthy '749 patent discloses a composition comprising a mixture of an alkali or alkaline earth metal hypochlorite, a bromide ion source and a stabilizer (column 4, lines 54-67; and column 5, lines 1-2).” (Id. at 5.) We find that Appellant has the better argument, and the rejection is reversed. McCarthy teaches: A stabilized aqueous alkali or alkaline earth metal hypobromite solution may be prepared in the following fashion: a. Mixing an aqueous solution of alkali or alkaline earth metal hypochlorite having from about 5 percent to about 70 percent available halogen as chlorine with a water soluble bromide ion source; b. Allowing the bromide ion source and the alkali or alkaline earth metal hypochlorite to react to form a 0.5 to 70 percent by weight aqueous solution of unstab[i]lized alkali or alkaline earth metal hypobromite; c. Adding to the unstabilized solution of alkali or alkaline earth metal hypobromite an aqueous solution of an alkali metal sulfamate in a quantity to provide a molar ratio of alkali metal sulfamate to alkali or alkaline earth metal hypobromite from about 0.5 to about 7; and 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013