Ex Parte Serafica et al - Page 1



                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                      
                                      is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                     Ex parte GONZALO SERAFICA,                                              
                            RICHARD MORMINO, and RUSSELL A. HOON                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-4217                                                
                                          Application 10/345,394                                             
                                          Technology Center 1600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                        Decided: October 11, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  


                Before DEMETRA J. MILLS, ERIC GRIMES, and LORA M. GREEN,                                     
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                            
                Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-27.  We have jurisdiction under 35                    
                U.S.C. § 6(b).  Claim 1 is representative of the claims on appeal, and reads                 
                as follows:                                                                                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013