Cross References
Applicability of article to captive insurers, see §431:19-115.5.
Law Journals and Reviews
Tort and Insurance "Reform" in a Common Law Court. 14 UH L. Rev. 55.
Case Notes
Rent-a-car company's rental agreement provision, which attempted to shift primary responsibility for providing minimum insurance coverage to the renter's personal insurance policy, violated the public policy enumerated in this chapter. 88 H. 274, 965 P.2d 1274.
The owner of a vehicle has the primary obligation to provide minimum coverage for the owned vehicle and this obligation may not be avoided through a unilateral contract with a permissive user of the vehicle. 88 H. 274, 965 P.2d 1274.
When a defendant is charged with a violation of this article, §805-13 is the proper procedural statute for the district court, enforcement officers, and the prosecutor's office to follow. 86 H. 331 (App.), 949 P.2d 171.
As §1-1 does not establish the supremacy of the 1840 Constitution over the current state constitution, or somehow render the documents concurrent, whether chapter 431 violated the 1840 Constitution was immaterial for purposes of defendant's conviction. 90 H. 130 (App.), 976 P.2d 444.
§431:10C-116 Challenges to motor vehicle insurance law; intervention by attorney general. At the request of the commissioner, the attorney general shall intervene in any case before any appellate court in this State in which the constitutionality or validity of this article or any part thereof is at issue, and may appeal to the United States Supreme Court, if necessary, to obtain a final determination of any case. [L 1987, c 347, pt of §2; am L 1997, c 251, §26]
Section: Previous 431-10c-112.5 431-10c-113 431-10c-114 431-10c-115 431-10c-115.5 431-10c-115.6 431-10c-115.7 431-10c-116 431-10c-117 431-10c-117.5 431-10c-118 431-10c-119 431-10c-120 431-10c-121 431-10c-201 NextLast modified: October 27, 2016