When, after an event, measures are taken which, if taken previously, would have made the event less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove negligence or culpable conduct in connection with the event. This section does not require the exclusion of evidence of subsequent measures when offered for another purpose, such as proving ownership, control, or feasibility of precautionary measures, if controverted, or impeachment. [1981 c.892 §27]
Section: Previous 40.150 40.155 40.160 40.170 40.172 40.175 40.180 40.185 40.190 40.195 40.200 40.205 40.210 40.225 40.230 NextLast modified: August 7, 2008