- 5 - At all times during the years 1990, 1991 and 1992 the Petitioner possess[ed] and did possess [her] Sovereign (God-given) Rights to own, acquire and protect [her] private property. At all times during the years of 1990, 1991 and 1992 the Petitioner possessed and does possess [her] "labor" as property. Respondent's Rule 40 Motion and Subsequent Developments As indicated, respondent filed a Motion To Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted. On July 19, 1995, shortly after respondent filed her motion to dismiss, the Court issued an order calendaring respondent's motion for hearing and also directing petitioner to file a proper second amended petition in accordance with the requirements of Rule 34. In particular, the Court directed petitioner to file a proper second amended petition setting forth with specificity each error allegedly made by respondent in the determination of the deficiencies and separate statements of every fact upon which the assignments of error are based. On August 14, 1995, petitioner filed the following: (1) Objection to respondent's motion, (2) Rule 50(c) statement, and (3) second amended petition. The second amended petition sounds a single theme, of which the following statements are representative: a return which [does] not "voluntarily assess" [does] not provide the necessary Material Facts upon which the Commissioner [can] determine a tax liability * * * Therefore Petitioner believing she is a non- taxpayer and not required to file, further shows thatPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011