Tashina Baker - Page 6

                                                - 6 -                                                   
                  even if she were compelled by law to report, she is not                               
                  mandated to assess, hence all of the court's rulings on                               
                  the voluntary assessment aspect of the tax system, and                                
                  without the voluntary assessment and material facts the                               
                  government prepared bookkeeping 'dummy/substitute'                                    
                  forms/returns are without a basis in law or fact upon                                 
                  which to rely for the authority to examine or audit.                                  
                  The bookkeeping returns prepared by the Respondent are                                
                  Forms 1040.  Any issue alleged for failure to report or                               
                  file is an issue not justiciable in this court, for                                   
                  this court has only been mandated to determine the                                    
                  alleged civil liability, if there is one, after it has                                
                  exercised its review of the procedures used by                                        
                  Respondent in the determinations made. * * *                                          
                                    *   *   *   *   *   *   *                                           
                        Petitioner states that the Form 1040 has not been                               
                  authorized by the Office of Management and Budget for                                 
                  the collection of information/return for the Individual                               
                  Income Tax found in Title 26 United States Code �1,                                   
                  which is a direct tax * * *.                                                          
                                    *   *   *   *   *   *   *                                           
                        Petitioner states that she is not identified in                                 
                  the Internal Revenue Code by person, class of persons,                                
                  and/or activity as a taxpayer (as defined in the                                      
                  internal revenue code) and therefore Petitioner is not                                
                  subject to an internal revenue tax.                                                   
                        Petitioner has never been afforded a hearing to                                 
                  determine if she is a "taxpayer" as defined within the                                
                  definition of the internal revenue code.  Since non-                                  
                  taxpayers are not within the purview of the code they                                 
                  are not subject to any internal revenue tax.  Therefore                               
                  the above determinations are in error.                                                
                        Since I am not that taxpayer, and the respondent                                
                  has not made such an assertion nor is there any                                       
                  evidence before this Court that I am engaged in any                                   
                  revenue taxable activity, happening or event, for which                               
                  Congress possess[es] legislative jurisdiction, and for                                
                  which the Commissioner possess[es] subject matter                                     
                  jurisdiction, the notice of deficiency constitutes a                                  
                  "counterfeit security" and its signer is subject to                                   
                  punishment under Title 18 United States Code Section                                  
                  552 as a felony.  Since this counterfeit security was                                 
                  sent through the mail the sender has committed mail                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011