Beaver Bolt Inc. - Page 14

                                                - 14 -                                                  

            1284, 1307-1308 (1986) (both cases uphold an allocation by the                              
            parties that resulted from arm's-length negotiations between                                
            parties with adverse tax interests); O'Dell & Co. v.                                        
            Commissioner, supra at 468 (the adverse tax interests of the                                
            parties to a noncompetition agreement deter allocations which                               
            lack economic reality).  Absent adverse tax interests, we                                   
            strictly scrutinize allocations to a covenant not to compete.                               
            2.    Effect of the Parties' Stipulation That Grecco's Stock in                             
                  Petitioner Was Worth $189,300                                                         
                  Petitioner paid Grecco $513,400 to redeem her stock and for                           
            her covenant not to compete for 3 years.  Petitioner and Grecco                             
            allocated $383,400 of that amount to the covenant.                                          
                  Respondent and petitioner agree that the value of Grecco's                            
            redeemed stock was $189,300.  The difference between petitioner's                           
            payment to Grecco under the redemption agreement ($513,400) and                             
            the value of the stock ($189,300) is $324,100.                                              
                  Petitioner and Grecco did not have adverse tax interests                              
            with respect to the allocation of $383,400 to the covenant.                                 
            However, Grecco and petitioner negotiated the total redemption                              
            price at arm's length.  Also, petitioner and respondent                                     
            stipulated that the stock was worth $189,300.  Petitioner                                   
            contends that the remaining payments were payments for Grecco's                             
            agreement not to compete.                                                                   
                  Respondent misses the point of petitioner's argument by                               
            reiterating that Grecco and petitioner did not have adverse                                 




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011