- 14 - 1284, 1307-1308 (1986) (both cases uphold an allocation by the parties that resulted from arm's-length negotiations between parties with adverse tax interests); O'Dell & Co. v. Commissioner, supra at 468 (the adverse tax interests of the parties to a noncompetition agreement deter allocations which lack economic reality). Absent adverse tax interests, we strictly scrutinize allocations to a covenant not to compete. 2. Effect of the Parties' Stipulation That Grecco's Stock in Petitioner Was Worth $189,300 Petitioner paid Grecco $513,400 to redeem her stock and for her covenant not to compete for 3 years. Petitioner and Grecco allocated $383,400 of that amount to the covenant. Respondent and petitioner agree that the value of Grecco's redeemed stock was $189,300. The difference between petitioner's payment to Grecco under the redemption agreement ($513,400) and the value of the stock ($189,300) is $324,100. Petitioner and Grecco did not have adverse tax interests with respect to the allocation of $383,400 to the covenant. However, Grecco and petitioner negotiated the total redemption price at arm's length. Also, petitioner and respondent stipulated that the stock was worth $189,300. Petitioner contends that the remaining payments were payments for Grecco's agreement not to compete. Respondent misses the point of petitioner's argument by reiterating that Grecco and petitioner did not have adversePage: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011