John J. Burke and Vivian Burke - Page 26

            or 10 percent of the tax required to be shown on the return.  Sec.                          
            6661(b)(1)(A).  An amount may be reduced, however, if the taxpayer shows that               
            there was substantial authority for such treatment of the item, or that the                 
            relevant facts affecting the tax treatment of the item are adequately                       
            disclosed on the return or in a separate statement attached to the return.                  
            Sec. 6661(b)(2)(B).  Respondent's determinations are presumed correct, and Mr.              
            Burke bears the burden of proving otherwise.  Rule 142(a); Hall v.                          
            Commissioner, 729 F.2d 632, 635 (9th Cir. 1984), affg. T.C. Memo. 1982-337;                 
            Bixby v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 757, 791-792 (1972); Kerr v. Commissioner, T.C.              
            Memo. 1990-155.                                                                             
                  Mr. Burke did not address this issue on brief.  We sustain the additions              
            to tax pursuant to section 6661 as determined in the notice of deficiency and               
            hold that Mr. Burke is also liable for this addition to tax with respect to                 
            the understatement of tax attributable to additional income of $22,448, which               
            we have found for 1986.                                                                     

                                                             Decision will be entered                   
                                                       under Rule 155.                                  



























Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011