Foretravel, Inc. - Page 23

                                                 - 23 -                                                    
            motor home owner, such as a leader or organizer of a motor home                                
            association or club.  Petitioner felt that having that person own                              
            a Foretravel coach could influence other members of that                                       
            association or club to do the same.  To maintain customer                                      
            goodwill, petitioner would authorize a special deal or a                                       
            favorable trade on another Foretravel model when a customer                                    
            returned a coach and complained of poor quality.  To alleviate                                 
            temporary cash-flow problems, petitioner might allow a dealer to                               
            sell a new or used coach financed by petitioner at a discount in                               
            order to generate cash-flow to petitioner.  To maintain its                                    
            reputation as a top quality or "highline" coach manufacturer,                                  
            petitioner established relatively high wholesale and suggested                                 
            retail prices.  The yearend incentive payments allowed petitioner                              
            to maintain its position in the public's eye as a top quality                                  
            coach manufacturer while reducing the wholesale cost of the coach                              
            to the dealer when necessary.  Petitioner also believed that a                                 
            firm wholesale price provided salespeople with a floor that they                               
            could use to negotiate with customers.                                                         
                  Petitioner took all of the various factors discussed above                               
            into account when determining the incentive payment for the                                    
            dealerships.  Petitioner had no written policy as to the amount                                
            of the incentive paid to each dealer.  Franklin and Moore                                      
            discussed throughout the year the various transactions that would                              
            give rise to a rebate.  At the end of petitioner's fiscal year,                                
            Franklin again discussed the various transactions with Moore, and                              




Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011