John Edward Kerrigan and Joan Marie Kerrigan - Page 14

                                               - 14 -                                                  
            "adequate records" threshold are still entitled to a deduction                             
            for expenses that they can substantiate with other corroborative                           
            evidence.  Sec. 1.274-5(c)(3), Income Tax Regs.  Usually, this                             
            will consist of the written or oral testimony of the individuals                           
            entertained by the taxpayer.  Sec. 1.274-5(c)(3), Income Tax                               
            Regs.                                                                                      
            Section 274(e) modifies the requirements of subsection (a) in                              
            permitting a deduction for expenses incurred for food and                                  
            beverages that are furnished to individuals under circumstances                            
            generally considered conducive to a business discussion.  Sec.                             
            274(e)(1).  Factors entering into this determination include the                           
            surroundings in which the food and beverages are furnished, the                            
            trade, business, or income-producing activity of the taxpayer,                             
            and the relationship to such trade, business, or activity of the                           
            person furnished with the food or beverages.  Sec. 274(e).                                 
                  Mrs. Kerrigan did not record the business purpose of these                           
            almost daily meals or the business relationship of the persons                             
            whom she entertained.  Nor have petitioners introduced testimony                           
            of any of Mrs. Kerrigan's business clients.  See sec. 1.274-                               
            5(c)(3), Income Tax Regs.  Under these circumstances, petitioners                          
            have not met the substantiation requirements.  See, e.g., Sam                              
            Goldberger, Inc. v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 1532, 1558 (1987);                               
            Walliser v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 433, 442 (1979).                                         
                  In addition, Mrs. Kerrigan claimed a business deduction for                          






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011