- 7 - The prepayment credit was erroneously taken into consideration prior to arriving at the deficiency figure. The deficiency should have been calculated without taking into consideration prepayment credits. The notice of deficiency issued to Yvonne was based upon the adjustments in the following chart: Item and Source 1990 1991 One-half of Doyle's wages - IRP $1,200 $500 Interest - IRP 221 370 one-half of Doyle's two Schedules C net income 4,538 4,728 Schedule C Yvonne King Real Estate (1990 IRP income, CPI expenses) 91,663 -0- (1991 CPI applied to the 1990 figures) 95,513 Rental income - source unknown -0- 8,000 Exemption deduction (2,050) (1,118) Self-employment tax deduction (3,925) (4,590) _ _ Mortgage interest deduction - 1990 and 1991 - IRP (5,411) (7,536) Total adjustments 86,236 97,503* *Per the deficiency notice. Income tax 24,389 26,784 Prepayment credit 3,330 -0 Income tax balance 21,059 26,784 Self-employment tax 7,849 9,180 Total tax liability 28,908 35,964 The prepayment credit was erroneously taken into consideration prior to arriving at the deficiency figure. The deficiency should have been calculated without taking into consideration prepayment credits. For 1990 and 1991, petitioners had income, as reflected inPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011