Doyle A. King - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          participate cooperatively in the audit process or preparation               
          for trial.                                                                  
               Respondent's determinations in the notices of deficiency               
          are presumed correct, and the burden of proof rests with                    
          petitioners to establish that such determinations are                       
          incorrect. Rule 142(a). Respondent filed amended answers in                 
          which increased deficiencies are asserted, and under the same               
          Tax Court Rule respondent bears the burden of proof as to these             
          increased amounts.                                                          
               If a taxpayer fails to file a return, the Commissioner may             
          reconstruct the taxpayer's income using third party                         
          information, and such calculation is presumptively correct.                 
          Avery v.Commissioner, 574 F.2d 467, 468 (9th Cir. 1978), affg.              
          T.C. Memo. 1976-129. Furthermore, if a taxpayer fails to                    
          produce business books and records, the Commissioner is                     
          authorized to determine the taxpayer's income using the CPI in              
          conjunction with a past year's return. Edwards v. Commissioner,             
          680 F.2d 1268 (9th Cir. 1982), affg. an unreported Tax Court                
          Order.                                                                      
               Petitioners complain that Respondent's resort to third                 
          party information and the use of the CPI is unfair because 1989             
          was a much better year for them than 1990 and 1991 due to the               
          collapse of the California real estate market. The fact that                
          the Court has no way of evaluating this contention is of                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011