Jerome J. and Beatrice A. Mack - Page 34

                                        -  -34                                           
               We conclude that petitioners did not have substantial                  
          authority for their position with respect to the items we have              
          determined against them and the items they have conceded, nor did           
          they adequately disclose on their return facts that would have              
          revealed the controversy with respect to those items.  If, and to           
          the extent that the amount of understatement makes section 6661             
          or section 6662 applicable to petitioners, we hold for respondent           
          on this issue.                                                              


                                                       Decision will be               
                                             entered under Rule 155.                  



























Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  

Last modified: May 25, 2011