Angela Matthews - Page 13

                                               - 13 -                                                 
            Name               Time            Rate    Lodestar Amount                                
            Jill R. Zimmerman1 51 hrs., 21 min.             $100/hr.   $ 5,135.00                     
            Kenneth J. Rubin        5 hrs., 27 min.         $150/hr.       817.50                     
            John E. Becker      12 hrs., 5 min.             $150/hr.     1,812.50                     
            Lori A. Feldish         12 hrs., 30 min.        $75/hr.       937.50                      
            TOTAL:      $8,702.50                                                                     
                  1  Jill R. Zimmerman is the docket attorney to whom                                 
                  these cases were assigned.  She commenced employment                                
                  with respondent's Office of Chief Counsel and was                                   
                  admitted to practice before this Court in Jan. 1995.                                
                  Kenneth J. Rubin is an Assistant District Counsel and                               
                  supervised the work of Ms. Zimmerman.  (The record does                             
                  not reflect the extent of Mr. Rubin's background or                                 
                  experience.)  John E. Becker is a senior trial attorney                             
                  with a post of duty in Philadelphia.  He has been                                   
                  employed by respondent's Office of Chief Counsel since                              
                  1971.  He sometimes served as Acting Assistant District                             
                  Counsel and supervised the work of Ms. Zimmerman.  Lori                             
                  A. Feldish is a paralegal and has been employed by                                  
                  respondent's Office of Chief Counsel since Oct. 1987.                               
                  Petitioners do not dispute the hourly rates suggested by                            
            respondent.  However, petitioners' counsel asserts that                                   
            respondent's claim for the amount of time expended in this matter                         
            is excessive.  Mr. Ray argues that he should not be liable for                            
            fees associated with respondent's counsel's "on the job                                   
            training."                                                                                
                  Upon a review of the estimates submitted by respondent, we                          
            conclude that not all the time spent by respondent's counsel was                          
            due to the misconduct of Mr. Ray.  Respondent's claim of excess                           
            attorney and paralegal time exceeds 80 hours.  The attorney                               
            assigned to this case (Ms. Zimmerman) indicates in her affidavit                          
            that she spent over 51 hours in dealing with this case between                            
            June 12, 1995, and August 11, 1995.  A review of the specific                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011