- 8 - expense deductions, was not entitled to net operating loss deductions or general business credits, had understated his Schedule E rental income, had not substantiated certain amounts of Schedule E rental expenses, realized and recognized a capital gain upon the disposition of his TSI stock, and was liable for the additions to tax for fraud and substantial understatement of Federal income tax for the years in issue. In the alternative, respondent determined that petitioner was liable for additions to tax for negligence and delinquency for failure to timely file Federal income tax returns for years 1986 and 1987. OPINION Before dealing with the principal issues in the instant case, we will deal with two preliminary matters. First, petitioner contends that respondent's determinations in the notice of deficiency should not be given a presumption of correctness because the determinations are arbitrary. His argument implies that because respondent has made a number of concessions, the notice of deficiency is therefore arbitrary. We find no merit to this argument. To overcome the presumption of correctness, a taxpayer must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the deficiency was arbitrarily derived. Shriver v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 1 (1985), affd. per order (7th Cir. 1986); Dellacroce v. Commissioner, 83 T.C. 269 (1984); Llorente v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 260 (1980), affd. in part and revd. in part 649 F.2d 152 (2d Cir. 1981). Moreover, a determination that some part of a deficiency is erroneous does not necessarily make the deficiency notice arbitrary and shift the burden of proof to respondent. Wells v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1983- 788. Furthermore, before a trial in the Tax Court, both parties are required to stipulate all matters to the maximum extent possible. See U.S. Tax Court Standing Pre-Trial Order. Accordingly, we hold that the burden of proof remains with petitioner. Second, petitioner argues that respondent is collaterally estopped from her determinations because respondent has previously approved petitioner'sPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011