Jack R. Prewitt and Shelley Prewitt - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          of conspiracy to commit fraud and numerous counts of mail fraud             
          and for filing a false 1983 income tax return in violation of               
          section 7206(1).  The indictment, among other charges, alleged              
          that petitioner, on or about June 29, 1984, filed a materially              
          false 1983 income tax return by failing to report a substantial             
          amount of income in addition to that stated on the income tax               
          return.  At the hearing under rule 11 of the Federal Rules of               
          Criminal Procedure, petitioner admitted that he received and                
          willfully failed to report a $21,000 management fee.  On May 2,             
          1990, petitioner pled guilty to filing a materially false 1983              
          income tax return under section 7206(1), and he was sentenced to            
          concurrent 3-year terms of imprisonment, along with the condition           
          that he make restitution to the crime victims.                              
                                       OPINION                                        
               This case is factually convoluted because of the maze of               
          entities, principals, and transactions involved.  The primary               
          factual pattern involves petitioner's odyssey from being a                  
          successful insurance salesman to his involvement in a Ponzi                 
          scheme and, ultimately, to his incarceration.  Initially,                   
          petitioner successfully sold insurance to farmers until he became           
          reinvolved with his insurance business mentor, Roy.  Roy, in                
          turn, introduced Dean Cooper to petitioner.  With the                       
          introduction of Roy and Cooper, petitioner's business activity              
          became complicated.  In addition to an S corporation through                
          which petitioner operated his life insurance agency, Roy's                  
          insurance agency became affiliated with petitioner through and in           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011