Jack R. Prewitt and Shelley Prewitt - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          of the payments were made by checks dated in 1983 and about                 
          $45,000 of the payments were made by checks dated in 1984.                  
          Petitioners' individual return was filed on a calendar year basis           
          and, accordingly, the 1984 payments ($45,000) would not be                  
          deductible for the 1983 taxable year.                                       
               Ordinarily, for a payment to be deductible under section               
          162, it must be made by the taxpayer as an ordinary and necessary           
          expense of the taxpayer's own business.  Betson v. Commissioner,            
          802 F.2d 365, 368 (9th Cir. 1986), affg. in part and revg. in               
          part T.C. Memo. 1984-264; Gantner v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 713,             
          725 (1988), affd. 905 F.2d 241 (8th Cir. 1990); Lohrke v.                   
          Commissioner, 48 T.C. 679, 684-685 (1967).                                  
               The initial obligation for the $33,000 of payments in 1983             
          (reimbursement of salesmen's expenses of $2,680.50 and helicopter           
          expense of $30,297) was that of the Mid-Continent corporations.             
          The payments, however, were made by checks drawn on the checking            
          account of petitioner's S corporation at a time when the Mid-               
          Continent corporations had ceased operations and were under a               
          court order not to operate.  In order to continue the sale of               
          insurance and his flow of income, petitioner had to see to the              
          payment of the outstanding obligations of the Mid-Continent                 
          corporations to salespeople and suppliers of goods and services.            
          Although he was no longer involved in the Ponzi type activity,              
          petitioner continued to exploit the customer lists from Riley               
          and, in general, to sell term insurance to farmers.  There is no            




Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011