18 corporation, in the years in issue, and therefore he is not entitled to basis for any amount of the debt with Frost Bank. Self-Employment Tax Petitioner argues that no additional self-employment tax is due from him for 1987 because petitioner wife had already reported and paid the maximum self-employment tax for 1987, which was $5,387.4 There is an upward limit on the amount upon which a Social Security self-employment tax is assessed, sec. 1402,5 but this in no way diminishes the obligation to report and pay income tax on self-employment income, sec. 1401(a). Petitioner wife received income of $15,000 on account of a referral fee from another lawyer. It was her self-employment income, not petitioner's. For income tax purposes, it was reportable by petitioners, and it is conceded it was not done. On this, respondent's determination of additional income is sustained. It was not, however, income of petitioner Don C. Reser for self-employment tax purposes, and it was error for respondent to determine a deficiency of $1,845 on account of it. 4 The pleadings here are not entirely clear, but the parties have treated and argued the issue of petitioner's self- employment tax as properly raised, and we will so treat it. 5 The maximum amount of self-employment income subject to self-employment tax in 1987 was $43,800.Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011