Don C. Reser and Rebecca Jo Reser - Page 21

                                          21                                           
          attributable to a substantial understatement.  An understatement             
          of tax is considered substantial if the understatement exceeds 10            
          percent of the proper income tax for the year.  Sec.                         
          6661(b)(1)(A).  The 25-percent addition will not apply to any                
          items for which there was substantial authority or items which               
          were adequately disclosed on the Federal income tax return.  Sec.            
          6661(b)(2)(B).                                                               
               Petitioner primarily cites Selfe v. United States, 778 F.2d             
          769 (11th Cir. 1985), as substantial authority for the position              
          that there was basis in DRPC.  The Selfe opinion, which was                  
          rejected by this Court in Estate of Leavitt v. Commissioner, 90              
          T.C. 206 (1988), held that a guaranty by the shareholders of an S            
          corporation which borrowed money would give rise to basis.                   
          Petitioner also argues that at the time of filing of the returns,            
          Selfe had not yet been rejected.  See Doe v. Commissioner, T.C.              
          Memo. 1993-543; Keech v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-71; Nigh              
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-349.  Petitioners filed their               
          1987 return on November 4, 1988, and their 1988 return on October            
          17, 1989.                                                                    
               We are not persuaded by petitioner.  This Court rejected                
          Selfe in Estate of Leavitt v. Commissioner, supra, on February               
          10, 1988, and was affirmed on May 19, 1989.  Petitioners can no              
          longer depend upon Selfe.  We think there was no substantial                 
          authority supporting of petitioners' position, and we hold for               
          respondent.                                                                  




Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011