- 7 -
Appointment; and (3) Motion for Continuance. All of petitioner's
motions were denied.5
On August 10, 1995, petitioner submitted the following 10
documents: (1) "Amended Petition under Tax Court Order", which
was filed as petitioner's Amended Petition; (2) "Assignment of
Errors", which was filed as petitioner's Amendment to Amended
Petition; (3) "Statement in Lieu of Appearance; Motion for
Summary Judgment", which was filed as (a) petitioner's Rule 50(c)
Statement and separately as (b) petitioner's Motion for Summary
Judgement; (4) "Motion for Leave of the Court", which was filed
as petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Brief in Support of Rule
50(c) Statement; (5) "Brief in Support of Amended Petition",
which was lodged as petitioner's Brief in Support of Rule 50(c)
Statement; (6) "Tables for Brief in Support", which was lodged as
petitioner's Appendix to Brief in Support of Rule 50(c)
Statement; (7) "Clarification of Petitioner's Claims of Statutory
Deprivations", which was filed as petitioner's Supplement to Rule
50(c) Statement; (8) "Demand for Relief", which was filed as
petitioner's Second Supplement to Rule 50(c) Statement; (9)
"Demand for Relief: Amended Petition", which was filed as
petitioner's Third Supplement to Rule 50(c) Statement; and (10)
5 In its Order denying petitioner's motions filed Aug. 2,
1995, the Court specifically reminded petitioner of the
applicability of Rule 50(c) providing for the submission of a
written statement in lieu of (or in addition to) a party's
appearance at a Motions Session.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011