Richard Santulli and Virginia Santulli - Page 20

                                       - 20 -                                         
               With regard to the telecommunications equipment, petitioners           
          reported the following on their tax returns for the years in                
          issue:                                                                      
                         1982                       1983                              
               Income              $2,213         $411,564                            
               Deduction                                                              
               Depreciation        541,531        794,245                             
               Interest       2,213               411,564                             
               Losses              541,531        794,245                             

                                       OPINION                                        
          I.  At-Risk Issue                                                           
               A.  Introduction                                                       
               These cases involve two equipment leasing transactions                 
          entered into by petitioner and characterized by the parties as              
          the "computer equipment activity" and the "telecommunications               
          equipment activity" (together, the activities).  Both activities            
          comprised similar elements:  A leasing company purchased                    
          equipment with funds borrowed from a bank.  The leasing company             
          leased the equipment to an end-user.  Rent payments to be                   
          received from the end-user were assigned to the bank as security            
          for the loan.  The leasing company then sold the equipment to a             
          middle company, which, in turn, sold the equipment to petitioner.           
          With regard to both of those sales, substantially all of the                
          purchase price was evidenced by a long-term note and the                    
          equipment was acquired subject to both the lease to the end-user            





Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011