Maurice H. Sochia and Beatrice M. Sochia - Page 2

                                          2                                           
          the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, except as                    
          otherwise noted.                                                            
               In the petition as originally filed herein, petitioners                
          alleged that they were residents and citizens of Texas and were             
          not subject to United States taxes; that they filed "Fifth                  
          Amendment" returns of income and were justified in doing so; that           
          the U.S. tax system is voluntary and petitioners have not elected           
          to file returns thereunder; that petitioners do not understand              
          the legal requirements of filing income tax returns; and                    
          petitioners further alleged certain amounts with respect to their           
          gross receipts, adjustments to gross receipts, deductions, and              
          exemptions for the years 1990 and 1991.  Finally, petitioners               
          alleged respondent owes them the total of $8,345 for both years.            
               Respondent filed a motion to dismiss herein for failure to             
          state a claim.  The Court ordered a new petition, with specific             
          errors of respondent alleged therein, and specific allegations of           
          facts, and the grounds, which petitioners rely upon.  Petitioners           
          replied to respondent's motion to dismiss, asserting generally              
          the same protester claims as in the petition, and adding a few              
          others, including allegations that the Federal Government was               
          engaged in "plundering" petitioners.                                        
               After a hearing by the Court, all petitioners' lengthy                 
          protester rhetoric was ordered stricken by the Court, except for            
          paragraph 2 of petitioners' response to respondent's motion which           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011