Bruno and Francesca Tabbi - Page 31

                                       - 31 -                                         
          operating loss of $31,149.29 for 1987.  They claim $13,277.71 as            
          a capital loss in 1987.                                                     
               We disagree.  Petitioners are not entitled to basis in                 
          Americana for petitioner husband's deposit of $9,800 into its               
          account because petitioner husband did not prove that this was a            
          true investment of funds in Americana; instead, it was an                   
          instance of petitioner husband's moving funds between accounts.             
          Petitioners did not offer any evidence showing that the $2,660              
          petitioner husband paid to the Mazzolas was interest.  Also,                
          petitioners have not established the value of the assets they               
          received from Americana when it liquidated.  Petitioners have not           
          proven the amount of their basis in Americana, or that they may             
          deduct the business interest or net operating loss in the amounts           
          claimed.  Thus, petitioners may not deduct a capital or ordinary            
          loss upon Americana's liquidation.                                          
          6.   Unreported Interest Income                                             
               Gross income means all income from whatever source derived,            
          including dividends and interest.  Sec. 61(a).                              
               Petitioners argue that respondent erred in attributing                 
          interest income from Americana's bank account in 1987, 1988, and            
          1989, to petitioners.  They contend that interest earned on                 
          Americana's account went directly into the account and was not              
          used by petitioners.  Petitioners argue that a withdrawal of                
          funds from a closely held corporation is a dividend to the                  
          recipient-shareholder to the extent of the corporation's                    




Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011