Bruno and Francesca Tabbi - Page 28

                                       - 28 -                                         
          of business:  (a) The frequency and regularity of sales; (b) the            
          substantiality of sales; (c) the nature and extent of the                   
          taxpayer's business; (d) the purpose for which the taxpayer                 
          acquired and held the property before sale; (e) the extent of the           
          taxpayer's sales efforts by advertising or otherwise; and (f) the           
          extent of improvements to the property made by the taxpayer.                
          Byram v. United States, 705 F.2d 1418, 1424 (5th Cir. 1983);                
          United States v. Winthrop, 417 F.2d 905, 910 (5th Cir. 1969);               
          Ross v. Commissioner, 227 F.2d 265 (5th Cir. 1955), revg. T.C.              
          Memo. 1954-177; Goldberg v. Commissioner; 223 F.2d 709 (5th Cir.            
          1955), revg. 22 T.C. 533 (1954); Guardian Indus. Corp. v.                   
          Commissioner, 97 T.C. 308, 316-317 (1991), affd. without                    
          published opinion 21 F.3d 427 (6th Cir. 1994).                              
               Before the years at issue, petitioner husband sold                     
          properties regularly and frequently.  For example, he sold 16 of            
          the 17 properties he acquired personally or from Americana in               
          earlier years.  Petitioner husband actively advertised the houses           
          for sale and made substantial efforts to sell them.  See Norris             
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1986-151 (taxpayer's extensive                  
          solicitation and advertising efforts and use of time and energy             
          for real estate pursuits show that real estate was not held for             
          investment).  Petitioner husband made necessary repairs to keep             
          the houses in saleable condition.  See Norris v. Commissioner,              
          supra.  These factors suggest that petitioner husband held these            
          houses for sale to customers.                                               




Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011