- 29 - Unusual support or transfers of property to the spouse are considered even if the benefit is received after the years in issue. Hayman v. Commissioner, 992 F.2d at 1262; Estate of Krock v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 672, 679 (1989); S. Rept. 91-1537 (1970), 1971-1 C.B. 606, 607-608. In about 1986, Mr. Walker used at least $40,000 of the proceeds from his liquidation of West Jersey's assets and business to establish another corporation, PSI, whose shares were issued to and held in the name of Mrs. Walker and their son. Additionally, during 1980, Mr. Walker, by way of a check drawn on his and Mrs. Walker's joint checking account, paid over $76,000 to Merrill Lynch for an unexplained purpose. In their responses to certain interrogatories served upon them by respondent during pretrial discovery, Mr. and Mrs. Walker denied that Mr. Walker, during or after the years in issue, made any transfers of over $-500 to Mrs. Walker or that he had made any gifts of over $500 to her. At trial, these responses of theirs were shown to be untrue. We are not satisfied that Mr. and Mrs. Walker have disclosed all of the assets they owned during and after the years in issue. Neither are we convinced that they have provided full and complete information with respect to all transfers Mr. Walker may have made to Mrs. Walker during and after the years in issue. Mrs. Walker has thus failed to establish that she did not significantly benefit from Mr. Walker's unreported income. Rule 142(a); Purificato v. Commissioner, 9 F.3d at 294-295.Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011