Joseph T. Walker and Nancy Walker - Page 29

                                     - 29 -                                           
          Unusual support or transfers of property to the spouse are                  
     considered even if the benefit is received after the years in issue.             
     Hayman v. Commissioner, 992 F.2d at 1262; Estate of Krock v.                     
     Commissioner, 93 T.C. 672, 679 (1989); S. Rept. 91-1537 (1970), 1971-1           
     C.B. 606, 607-608. In about 1986, Mr. Walker used at least $40,000 of            
     the proceeds from his liquidation of West Jersey's assets and business           
     to establish another corporation, PSI, whose shares were issued to and           
     held in the name of Mrs. Walker and their son. Additionally, during              
     1980, Mr. Walker, by way of a check drawn on his and Mrs. Walker's               
     joint checking account, paid over $76,000 to Merrill Lynch for an                
     unexplained purpose.                                                             
          In their responses to certain interrogatories served upon them by           
     respondent during pretrial discovery, Mr. and Mrs. Walker denied that            
     Mr. Walker, during or after the years in issue, made any transfers of            
     over $-500 to Mrs. Walker or that he had made any gifts of over $500             
     to her. At trial, these responses of theirs were shown to be untrue.             
     We are not satisfied that Mr. and Mrs. Walker have disclosed all of              
     the assets they owned during and after the years in issue. Neither are           
     we convinced that they have provided full and complete information               
     with respect to all transfers Mr. Walker may have made to Mrs. Walker            
     during and after the years in issue. Mrs. Walker has thus failed to              
     establish that she did not significantly benefit from Mr. Walker's               
     unreported income. Rule 142(a); Purificato v. Commissioner, 9 F.3d at            
     294-295.                                                                         






Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011