- 7 - is utilized to decide the tax consequences. Aquilino v. United States, 363 U.S. 509, 512-513 (1960). In Commissioner v. Estate of Bosch, 387 U.S. 456 (1967), the U.S. Supreme Court held that pursuant to Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), "state law as announced by the highest court of the State is to be followed." Commissioner v. Estate of Bosch, supra at 465. Moreover, the court explained: the underlying substantive rule involved is based on state law and the State's highest court is the best authority on its own law. If there be no decision by that court then federal authorities must apply what they find to be the state law after giving "proper regard" to relevant rulings of other courts of the State. In this respect, it may be said to be, in effect, sitting as a state court. [Id.; citation omitted.] Thus, our inquiry here focuses on whether, under California law, petitioner was the sole owner of the Paddock Lane property at the time of the sale. California Civil Code section 5110.710 (West 1983) provides that, subject to sections 5110.720 through 5110.730, inclusive, married persons may, by agreement or transfer, with or without consideration, do any of the following: (a) Transmute community property into separate property of either spouse; (b) transmute separate property of either spouse into community property; orPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011