Francine Acquaviva - Page 25

                                       - 25 -                                         
          must be considered in the totality of the circumstances.                    
          Purificato v. Commissioner, supra at 293; sec. 1.6013-5(b),                 
          Income Tax Regs.                                                            
                    a.  1985 Taxable Year                                             
               Petitioner has not demonstrated that she did not realize a             
          significant benefit from the 1985 insurance proceeds.  Petitioner           
          failed to produce the couple's joint checking account records for           
          the 1985 tax year as she did for the 1986 and 1987 tax years.               
          The failure of a party to produce relevant evidence within its              
          possession or control gives rise to the presumption that, if                
          produced, it would be unfavorable.  Wichita Terminal Elevator Co.           
          v. Commissioner, 6 T.C. 1158, 1165 (1946), affd. 162 F.2d 513               
          (10th Cir. 1947).                                                           
               Petitioner failed to meet her burden of proving that it                
          would be inequitable, within the meaning of section                         
          6013(e)(1)(D), to hold her liable for that portion of the                   
          deficiency related to 1985.  Therefore, she is not an "innocent             
          spouse" in 1985.                                                            
                    b.  1986 Taxable Year                                             
               With respect to the 1986 condemnation award, a check                   
          representing Mr. Acquaviva's share of the condemnation award was            
          deposited into his personal checking account.  The bulk of the              
          condemnation award was used in Mr. Acquaviva's real estate                  
          ventures, which failed in subsequent years.  In this regard, we             
          believe petitioner did not receive any of the benefits of                   




Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011