Alondra Industries, Limited, d.b.a. Accent Insulation Company and Subsidiaries, et al. - Page 29

                                         29                                           
          section 162(a)(3) and may therefore be rendered nondeductible.              
          Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. Commissioner, 458 F.2d 631, 634 (9th Cir.            
          1972), affg. T.C. Memo. 1970-74; Hyde v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.           
          1974-103.  In the absence of arm's-length negotiations,                     
          determination of what is a reasonable rental requires an inquiry            
          into whether the amount paid exceeds what a lessee dealing at               
          arm's length with a stranger would have been required to pay.               
          Peck v. Commissioner, 904 F.2d 525, 528 (9th Cir. 1990), affg. 90           
          T.C. 162 (1988); Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra at              
          635.  The taxpayer has the burden of rebutting the Commissioner's           
          determination, initially entitled to a presumption of                       
          correctness, that rental payments are unreasonable, even when the           
          Commissioner has disallowed them in their entirety.  Audano v.              
          United States, 428 F.2d 251, 257 (5th Cir. 1970).                           
               Here, petitioners have not carried that burden, particularly           
          since respondent has disallowed only a relatively small part of             
          their rental payments:  $33,738 out of a total of $245,237                  
          claimed as deductions by all three petitioners, leaving a total             
          deduction of $211,499 not in dispute.  Mr. Clearman testified               
          that the rent for both the Lilac Avenue and the El Centro                   
          properties was determined every 1 to 2 years by calling a local             
          realtor and inquiring into the prevailing rents for similar                 
          properties.  However, this was the only evidence offered by                 
          petitioners to support the conclusion that the rents were fair              
          and reasonable.  We are not satisfied that the rents were                   




Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011