Barry B. Bealor and Nancy L. Bealor, et al. - Page 131

                                       - 79 -                                         
          a demand note in the amount of $585,511,25 without interest,                
          dated July 1, 1987.                                                         
               The demand note bore endorsements that were recorded by                
          journal entries as capital distributions from MIT 86 to its                 
          partners and then as payments on their notes to Qulart.  As a               
          result of these endorsements, the notes were credited against the           
          partners' notes to Qulart, then applied as Qulart's payment of              
          its note to Machise.  The partners in MIT 86 made no cash                   
          payments in 1987 on their notes to Qulart.                                  
               For the year 1987, MIT 86 changed its method of accounting             
          from the cash method to the accrual method.  On its partnership             
          return for 1987, MIT 86 reported partnership taxable income of              
          $4,855,505, which consisted of $4,652,314 (the deferred income              
          that it reported due to the change in accounting method), plus              
          $203,191, which it called fee income and which represented the              
          accrual of interest payable from MPC, and no expenses.                      
               For the year 1987 Fred, as vice president of BBPA, the tax             
          matters partner of MIT 86, has filed an amended Form 1065 as a              
          protective administrative adjustment request.  Therein he seeks             
          to have the income reported by MIT 86 for the year 1987 reduced             
          to zero, in the event that we determine MIT 86 to be a sham, not            
          entitled to deduct the losses claimed for 1986.  The claim is               


          25The amount of $585,511 appearing on the note was incorrect                
          and should have been $588,511.  The transaction was recorded on             
          the books of MIT 86 and MPC in the amount of $588,511.                      




Page:  Previous  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011