- 86 - application. She could not identify any of the partnerships, MIT 80 through 86, nor W & A. She acknowledged that W & A appeared as payor on her 1987 paychecks and on the Form W-2 filed with her Federal income tax return for that year. However, she was not aware that she had been a leased employee. Machise considered the amount spent by W & A, some $3,586,269 in 1987, as the amount of payroll costs incurred under the employee leasing agreement. In 1987, W & A reported a loss of $3,586,269, and a separate item of portfolio income of $113. On their individual income tax returns for 1987, the investors in W & A reported on Schedule E the partnership losses from W & A in proportion to their interests. Respondent issued a notice of final partnership administrative adjustment to W & A, in which respondent disallowed the entire claimed loss of $3,586,269 for the year 1987. In 1987, the New Jersey Department of Labor canceled the unemployment tax accounts of the partnerships whose accounts could be reached under the applicable statute of limitations. The Department of Labor transferred credits for the funds that had been ostensibly paid by the partnerships from the partnerships' accounts to Machise. The Department did so because it had determined Machise to be the party that was liable for unemployment tax contributions. By 1988, Fred had decided that his assumption or legal conclusion underlying the W & A arrangements--that W & A couldPage: Previous 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011