Charles R. Bowden and Sue I. Bowden - Page 30

                                               - 30 -                                                  

            identify and prorate those expenses of home use water                                      
            purification systems.  They explained that the home use aspect                             
            was “overlooked” in their Federal income tax returns because it                            
            was no more than 2 percent of the total revenue.                                           
                  Because petitioners have not been able to substantiate the                           
            amounts of expenses or establish their ownership and operation of                          
            the approximately 70 vending machines, we hold that they are not                           
            entitled to deduct the claimed expenses.                                                   
            C.  Petitioners’ Obligation To Report Gross Income From the                                
            Vending Machines                                                                           
                  Petitioners contend, in the alternative, if they are not                             
            entitled to deduct vending machine depreciation and deductions                             
            claimed on their Schedules C for 1986 and 1989, then they                                  
            incorrectly reported the gross receipts from those same vending                            
            machines.  Petitioners reported gross receipts from the vending                            
            machines of $163,001 and $72,817 on their 1986 and 1989 Schedules                          
            C, respectively.  Respondent contends that petitioners                                     
            constructively received income from their corporations.                                    
                  The notice of deficiency makes no determination concerning                           
            the income or its source reported on petitioners’ Schedules C.                             
            Respondent’s determination regarding the Schedules C simply                                
            involved the disallowance of the claimed deductions.  For                                  
            purposes of trial and briefing, respondent argues that                                     
            petitioners did not establish their entitlement to the                                     
            depreciation or other deductions in connection with the vending                            




Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011