Joel L. and Delynn E. Boyce - Page 3

                                                - 3 -                                                  

            premature distribution from an individual retirement account, a                            
            distribution from the Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund,                             
            and capital gains from the sale of mutual funds and real estate.                           
                  Petitioners filed a petition with this Court on April 19,                            
            1996.  The gist of petitioners' allegations in their petition is                           
            that (1) petitioners are "American citizens and residents                                  
            (Domestic) and not united states citizens and/or residents                                 
            (National)"; (2) that this case can only be heard by an Article                            
            III court;2 (3) that the issuance of the notice of deficiency was                          
            an abuse of discretion by the Commissioner; (4) that the                                   
            Commissioner erroneously and arbitrarily determined that                                   
            petitioners were "taxpayers", that they received "taxable                                  
            income", and that they were engaged in a "taxable activity"; (5)                           
            that petitioners have been denied adequate notice and a                                    
            meaningful opportunity to be heard at the administrative level;                            
            (6) that petitioners have been denied certain procedural                                   
            safeguards guaranteed to them as "sovereign citizens of one of                             
            the several Sovereign Republican states of the Continental States                          
            United"; (7) that petitioners have been labeled "tax protesters";                          
            and (8) that the additions to tax under sections 6651 and 6654                             
            are confined to alcohol, tobacco, and firearms revenue.                                    


            2  Petitioners did not explain why they filed a petition in                                
            an Article I court.  They could have paid the deficiencies and                             
            additions to tax and filed a claim for refund, and, if                                     
            disallowed, sued for refund in an Article III Court.                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011