5 of proof to the taxpayer and allegedly denies taxpayers their right under the Seventh Amendment to a jury trial. Petitioner's arguments have been consistently rejected by this Court and others, and we have no persuasive reason to depart from the analysis of these cases. E.g., Freytag v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 849, 888 (1987), affd. 904 F.2d 1011 (5th Cir. 1990), affd. 501 U.S. 868 (1991); Swanson v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 1180, 1182 (1976) ("a taxpayer is not entitled to a jury trial in the Tax Court") (citing Cupp v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 68 (1975), affd. without published opinion 559 F.2d 1107 (3d Cir. 1977); Roberts v. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 834, 838 (1974) (burden of proof); Dorl v. Commissioner, 57 T.C. 720, 721-722 (1972), affd. per curiam 507 F.2d 406 (2d Cir. 1974); Burns, Stix Friedman & Co., Inc. v. Commissioner, 57 T.C. 392 (1971) (the Tax Court is an Article I Court and its exercise of jurisdiction does not violate Article III)). Based on the reasoning of these cases, and in light of petitioner's failure to present any credible evidence to the contrary, we find petitioner's arguments devoid of any legal merit. Accordingly, respondent's determinations are presumed correct, and petitioner bears the burden of proving otherwise. Rule 142(a); INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992). All taxpayers are required to keep sufficient records to enable respondent to determine their correct tax liability. Sec. 6001; Meneguzzo v. Commissioner, 43 T.C. 824, 831-832 (1965).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011