Keith Robert Bradbury - Page 8

                                          8                                           
          not determinative; greater weight is given to objective factors             
          rather than to the taxpayer's mere statement of intent.  Engdahl            
          v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 659, 666 (1979).  Moreover, section 262            
          generally precludes a taxpayer from deducting personal, living,             
          or family expenses.                                                         
               Based on the record, we find that petitioner lacked the                
          requisite profit objective in carrying on his brokerage                     
          activities.  Petitioner contends that he carried on his brokerage           
          activities in a regular and continuous manner; however, the                 
          evidence he presented at trial indicates otherwise.  Petitioner             
          introduced 12 documents, including several form letters from                
          petitioner while he was associated with BLA and IBEX with names             
          of various companies inserted in the blanks and dated as far back           
          as September 10, 1982, letters regarding petitioner's membership            
          in a broker association, subscriptions to newsletters, lists of             
          potential buyers, and letters to petitioner regarding his status            
          as a "valued referral source" for Guaranty Acceptance Capital               
          Corporation (GACC) dated in late 1989 or 1990.  Petitioner also             
          introduced a brochure for K.R. Bradbury & Associates and a                  
          receipt for the printing thereof dated September 15, 1988.                  
               These documents do not demonstrate a regular and continuous            
          pursuit of brokerage activities for profit during the years at              
          issue.  Most of the letters are dated prior to 1988, none of the            
          documents are dated in 1988, and it appears that the only                   
          document dated during 1989 was the letter to petitioner regarding           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011