- 2 - and adopts the Opinion of the Special Trial Judge, which is set forth below. OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case is before the Court on (1) Respondent's Motion To Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted, as supplemented, filed pursuant to Rule 40; (2) petitioner's Motion To Shift Burden Of Proof To Respondent; and (3) petitioner's Motion To "Quash The Going Forward With The Evidence". Petitioner resided in Chesterton, Indiana, at the time that the petition was filed in this case. Respondent's Notice of Deficiency Respondent issued a notice of deficiency to petitioner dated July 12, 1995. In said notice, respondent determined the following deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income taxes and additions to tax: Additions to tax Year Deficiency Sec. 6651(a)(1) Sec. 6654(a) 1991 $19,1111 $4,028 $1,098 1992 12,037 3,009 524 1993 3,223 611 100 1 The determination of a statutory deficiency does not take into account certain payments and credits, such as payment on account of estimated tax. See sec. 6211(b)(1); see also infra note 2. The deficiencies in income taxes, which include self- employment taxes for 1991 and 1992, are based on respondent'sPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011